Film Analysis 12 Angry Men Essay - 789 Words

Guilty or not guilty, often an easy answer when you are not considering a life is on the line. However when a life is on the line, meaning that if the verdict is guilty, the person is automatically sentenced to death, you would hope a jury would be sure that a person is guilty beyond a reasonable doubt, before sending a person to death. While watching the movie, 12 Angry Men, what seemed to be an open-and-shut guilty verdict for the jury, instead took a viewer through numerous ethical dilemmas, specifically dealing with prejudice, capital punishment, integrity, anger and hostility resulting in reasonable doubt. Overview of Film A young man who is 18-years is on trial for the first-degree murder of his father, who the prosecution is†¦show more content†¦Ethical Dilemmas Over the course of the deliberations, the evidence that at first seemed so convincing is now being questioned, and often the jurors confront their own biases and prejudices leading them to either decide the defendant is guilty or not guilty regardless of the actual facts. Juror #1 is the Forman, he tries to be fair, and keep order within the hot room. He is convinced the defendant is guilty however, he wants to be sure they follow the judicial process regardless of how long it will take. After reviewing many of the facts of the case, he changes his view and votes not guilty based on reasonable doubt. Juror #3 is confident that the defendant is guilty and is convinced that this is the only option. Often yelling and angry that anyone would consider him anything but guilty. McLemore’s â€Å"Guideline #24: A fool thinks that he is always right† (2003), Juror #3’s mind was made up and he didn’t want anyone to confuse him with the facts. Towards the end of the movie, you can see why he is so determined to convict the defendant, it’s not about the case, it’s about a boy that reminds him of his own son, and their volatile relationship. He was the last juror to finally understand that his bias was stopping him from seeing the facts clearly, and finally votes not guilty. Juror #7, wants to move on, get the deliberations over with as quick as possible, since he has tickets to the ball game. He is soShow MoreRelatedFilm Analysis: 12 Angry Men1479 Words   |  6 Pages12 Angry Men (1957) focuses on a group of unnamed jurymen who must come to a unanimous decision regarding the guilt or innocence of an 18-year-old charged with murdering his father. While the trial is not depicted in the film, the jury deliberations are the central focus and examine several aspects of organization change and the obstacles that must be overcome in order to come to a unanimous agreement over the guilt or innocence of the accused. 12 Angry Men (1957) is a good example of the differentRead MoreAnalysis Of The Film 12 Angry Men 917 Words   |  4 Pagesthe team to reach its goals, the way in which communication is done can also affect the team’s progress. In the film â€Å"12 Angry Men†, many of the pros and cons of group communication are highlighted. An overarching and prominent theme of discussion in the movie is the impact that personality has on the way that individuals communicate with others. The members of the jury from the film run the gamut of communication and personality styles. Some team members are wise and empathetic, but there areRead More12 Angry Men Film Analysis711 Words   |  3 Pages12 Angry Men is an example of the role cinematography can play in creating the atmosphere of a film. This film is set almost entirely in one room, but is still able to construct extreme tension like few other films have been able to do. It establishes this partly through the brilliant dialogue and fiery performances of its twelve actors, but also through powerful use of cinematography that helps in creating the gradually-festering atmosphere of the film. The opening scene of 12 Angry Men is a low-angleRead More12 Angry Men Film Analysis1502 Words   |  7 PagesINTRODUCTION: 12 Angry Men is a 1957 American courtroom drama film adapted from a teleplay of the same name by Reginald Rose. Written and co-produced by Rose himself and directed by Sidney Lumet, this trial film tells the story of a jury made up of 12 men as they deliberate the guilt or acquittal of a defendant on the basis of reasonable doubt, forcing the jurors to question their morals and values. In the United States, a verdict in most criminal trials by jury must be unanimous. The film is notableRead MoreFilm Analysis Of 12 Angry Men1946 Words   |  8 PagesINTRODUCTION: 12 Angry Men is a 1957 American courtroom drama film adapted from a teleplay of the same name by Reginald Rose. Written and co-produced by Rose himself and directed by Sidney Lumet, this trial film tells the story of a jury made up of 12 men as they deliberate the guilt or acquittal of a defendant on the basis of reasonable doubt, forcing the jurors to question their morals and values. In the United States, a verdict in most criminal trials by jury must be unanimous. The film is notableRead More12 Angry Men: Analysis of the Film Essays3916 Words   |  16 PagesAnalysis of The film 12 Angry Men Jason Lovett MBA 611 Richard Devos School of Business Management Northwood University Executive Summary The Movie Twelve Angry Men is the ultimate example of a group of people forced to interact in order to reach a single, defined goal. The jury, which consists of 12 men, must deliberate until a unanimous decision is reached. In this specific example, which takes place in a New York courthouse, the decision holds the life of an 18 year old in the balanceRead MoreGroup Communication In 12 Angry Men935 Words   |  4 Pages12 Angry Men: Group Analysis Paper In 1957, the producers H. Fonda, G. Justin and R. Rose collaborated with the director S. Lumet to create the film, 12 Angry Men. In this paper, I will provide an analysis of the small group communication displayed by the main characters in the motion picture. I will discuss group communications, group development, group membership, group diversity, and group leadership. These topics will be dissected in order to properly examine the characters’ behavior. TheRead MoreGroup Decision-Making, Leadership, Influence and Power: Illustrations from the Film â€Å"12 Angry Men†1703 Words   |  7 PagesThe film â€Å"12 Angry Men (1957)† present a diverse group of twelve American jurors brought together to decide the guilt or innocence of a teenaged defendant in a seemingly open-and-shut murder trial case. The film illustrates the advantages and disadvantages of group decision-making, group developmental stages, leadership personality and models, social influence tactics and outcomes, and the bases of social power. The following advantages of group decision-making were demonstrated in this approximatelyRead More12 Angry Men Analysis909 Words   |  4 PagesMatter of Perspective: Heads or Tails The 1957 film 12 Angry Men is based around a group of twelve jurors as they decide the fate of a boy accused of murdering his father. From the very beginning the group is divided between those that think he is guilty, and those that don’t know. Every juror has their own opinion and reasoning behind their position, but there are two men that seem to become the backbones of their respective arguments. For the majority voting guilty, Juror #3 is the the criticalRead More12 Angry Men - Analysis3445 Words   |  14 PagesIntroduction 12 Angry Men (1957) is one of the most acclaimed feature films of all time. It was produced at a time when the United States was just twelve years out of World War II and â€Å"Leave It To Beaver† and â€Å"Father Knows Best† broadcast across television airwaves the perfection, conformity and affluence of American life that had been generated by the Great War. Additionally, this film was listed on the university syllabus as one of three films to see in regard to this course, Management 610 – Contexts